You are viewing:
South Africa
Switch to:
United Kingdom

My Right to Informed Consent

Our constitutional rights and the general international principle enshrine our right to informed consent.

Additionally, according to South African Medical laws and regulations, South Africans must sign their informed consent before receiving any medical treatment. 

Every patient must have enough information to be able to understand what medical or surgical treatment and procedure is being proposed and the potential risks and benefits thereof. 

This consent is a legal, lawful, moral and ethical requirement and must be freely given prior to the treatment taking place.

Unfortunately however, South Africans receiving COVID-19 “vaccines” are not given appropriate documents to sign prior to injection.

To obtain informed consent, our medical history and any existing allergies and conditions that we may have must be fully considered.

Given that the ingredients, quantities, the methods used to produce the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and patents are not in the public domain, and therefore undisclosed, it is impossible to perform the necessary allergy tests, or to know whether one will be at risk of an allergic reaction.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been incorrectly registered as “vaccines” whereas, they should, in fact, be registered as medical devices.

South Africans have not been informed of the potential risks to their health and also of the fact that they could die as a result of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. They have also not been properly advised of alternative treatments.

South Africans are given a pamphlet post-“vaccination” which states that they should call a hotline in the case of any adverse events. This would clearly be impossible in a situation where someone is experiencing a heart attack or stroke.

According to the laws and regulations governing medicine and medical treatments in South Africa, we have the right to request that proper medical support must be provided where and when those medicines and medical treatments are being administered.

COVID-19 “vaccinations” are however administered in settings where there is no medical support provided, and without our consent.

The lack of informed consent is a clear compromise of medical ethics and is nothing less than professional misconduct.

Failure to obtain legal and lawful and ethical and moral consent is a breach of multiple criminal and civil laws — both domestic and international. 

There can, in fact, be no informed consent for COVID-19 “vaccines”, due to the fact that long term safety data for chronic disease, such as cancer, requires a minimum of eleven years to have passed

You cannot have informed consent without proper information.

As all health professionals are fully aware of the above, criminal ethical medical misconduct can therefore be inferred.

Legal Background

International Law – Article 1 of the Nuremberg Code

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that:

  • the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; 
  • should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion:-
  • and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. 

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him:

  • the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; 
  • the method and means by which it is to be conducted; 
  • all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; 
  • and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. 

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

Constitutional Law – South Africa

Chapter 2 of the Constitution, Bill of Rights:

Section 12.2 c): No one is to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent.

The Declaration of Helsinki

Participation by individuals capable of giving informed consent as subjects in medical research must be voluntary. Although it may be appropriate to consult family members or community leaders, no individual capable of giving informed consent may be enrolled in a research study unless he or she freely agrees.

The Belmont Report

Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research

Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for informed consent are satisfied.

International Law – Australian Capital Territory

Section 10(2) of the Human Rights Act 2004 says that: 

No-one may be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her free consent. 

Note: The prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under international law applies at all times and under all circumstances.

And, if all the above is not enough cause for concern with regard to the situation we find ourselves in, there are very specific guidelines and requirements relating to informed consent where trials and research is involved. Please see downloads below:

We need

News Feed
Protect Our Children from the Trial “Vaccines”
19 June 2022 • Protect Our Children from the Trial “Vaccines” How to Action a Notice of Non-Consent and Cease and Desist Pinned
National Health Act Amendments: Make Your Voice Heard
7 April 2022 • National Health Act Amendments: Make Your Voice Heard How to push back against medical fascism and the proposed amendments to the National Health Act. Pinned
Majority of WHO member states want legally binding pandemic instrument
1 August 2022 • Majority of WHO member states want legally binding pandemic instrument World Health Organization member states have agreed to pursue a legally binding pandemic instrument that will contain “both legally binding as well as non-legally binding elements.”
Free My Smile – Stand together to get
 masks off students today!
18 June 2022 • Free My Smile – Stand together to get
 masks off students today! Are you a student, parent or teacher? 
If so, please stand together as South Africans and
 vote in our referendum.
The BELA Bill: Not all that Pretty
13 June 2022 The BELA Bill: Not all that Pretty And not all about home schooling, as they’d have you believe…
Covid Vaccines Cause a New, Fast-Acting Form of Deadly ‘Mad Cow’ Neurological Condition CJD, Says Leading Virologist
10 June 2022 • Covid Vaccines Cause a New, Fast-Acting Form of Deadly ‘Mad Cow’ Neurological Condition CJD, Says Leading Virologist The Covid vaccines appear to be responsible for the emergence of a new, fast-acting form of the deadly neurodegenerative condition Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), a study by a leading virologist has found.
A monumental victory for ANHP in the South African High Court
9 June 2022 A monumental victory for ANHP in the South African High Court The Alliance of Natural Health Products South Africa victorious after five-year fight with SAHPRA and the Minister of Health, who were trying to block access to much needed and life-saving natural vitamins and minerals.
You can be retrenched with zero severance for refusing vaccination, CCMA rules
16 May 2022 • You can be retrenched with zero severance for refusing vaccination, CCMA rules The ruling came in what the employment law practice of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) called a case with "relatively simple" underpinning facts.
See All
The Red List Menu
Home Q&A The Red List Green List