SA
You are viewing:
South Africa theredlist.co.za
Switch to:
United Kingdom theredlist.uk

My Right to Informed Consent

Our constitutional rights and the general international principle enshrine our right to informed consent.

Additionally, according to South African Medical laws and regulations, South Africans must sign their informed consent before receiving any medical treatment. 

Every patient must have enough information to be able to understand what medical or surgical treatment and procedure is being proposed and the potential risks and benefits thereof. 

This consent is a legal, lawful, moral and ethical requirement and must be freely given prior to the treatment taking place.

Unfortunately however, South Africans receiving COVID-19 “vaccines” are not given appropriate documents to sign prior to injection.

To obtain informed consent, our medical history and any existing allergies and conditions that we may have must be fully considered.

Given that the ingredient quantities, the methods used to produce the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and patents are not in the public domain, and therefore undisclosed, it is impossible to perform the necessary allergy tests, or to know whether one will be at risk of an allergic reaction.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been incorrectly registered as “vaccines” whereas, they should, in fact, be registered as medical devices.

South Africans have not been informed of the potential risks to their health and also of the fact that they could die as a result of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. They have also not been properly advised of alternative treatments.

South Africans are given a pamphlet post-“vaccination” which states that they should call a hotline in the case of any adverse events. This would clearly be impossible in a situation where someone is experiencing a heart attack or stroke.

According to the laws and regulations governing medicine and medical treatments in South Africa, we have the right to request that proper medical support must be provided where and when those medicines and medical treatments are being administered.

COVID-19 “vaccinations” are however administered in settings where there is no medical support provided, and without our consent.

The lack of informed consent is a clear compromise of medical ethics and is nothing less than professional misconduct.

Failure to obtain legal and lawful and ethical and moral consent is a breach of multiple criminal and civil laws — both domestic and international. 

There can, in fact, be no informed consent for COVID-19 “vaccines”, due to the fact that long term safety data for chronic disease, such as cancer, requires a minimum of eleven years to have passed

You cannot have informed consent without proper information.

As all health professionals are fully aware of the above, criminal ethical medical misconduct can therefore be inferred. 

Legal Background

International Law – Article 1 of the Nuremberg Code

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that:

  • the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; 
  • should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion:-
  • and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. 

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him:

  • the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; 
  • the method and means by which it is to be conducted; 
  • all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; 
  • and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. 

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

International Law – Australian Capital Territory

Section 10(2) of the Human Rights Act 2004 says that: 

No-one may be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her free consent. 

Note: The prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under international law applies at all times and under all circumstances.

Constitutional Law – South Africa

Chapter 2 Bill of Rights:

Section 12.c): No one is to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent.

We need
informed
consent!

News Feed
Make Your Voice Heard
7 April 2022 • theredlist.co.za Make Your Voice Heard How to push back against medical fascism and the proposed amendments to the National Health Act. Pinned
You can be retrenched with zero severance for refusing vaccination, CCMA rules
16 May 2022 • businessinsider.co.za You can be retrenched with zero severance for refusing vaccination, CCMA rules The ruling came in what the employment law practice of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) called a case with "relatively simple" underpinning facts.
Don’t underestimate the power of your influence
13 May 2022 • drtesslawrie.substack.com Don’t underestimate the power of your influence We all need to do what we can to #StoptheWHO
Covid-19: World Health Organisation (WHO) Proposed Pandemic Treaty: President Sways on Imminent Threat
11 May 2022 • neasa.co.za Covid-19: World Health Organisation (WHO) Proposed Pandemic Treaty: President Sways on Imminent Threat NEASA, in an open letter to the President on 12 April 2022, requested confirmation and clarity on the extent of South Africa’s involvement in the WHO proposed pandemic treaty, as mentioned in various of the organisation’s press releases and newsletters.
India: Nobody Can Be Forced To Get Vaccinated; Vaccine Mandates Not Proportionate: Supreme Court
2 May 2022 • livelaw.in India: Nobody Can Be Forced To Get Vaccinated; Vaccine Mandates Not Proportionate: Supreme Court The Supreme Court on Monday held that no individual can be forced to get vaccinated and the right to bodily integrity of a person under Article 21 of the Constitution include the right to refuse vaccinate.
Concerns over amendments to Health Act and how they could result in abuse of power
24 April 2022 • news24.com Concerns over amendments to Health Act and how they could result in abuse of power “We have picked out five core issues which we have raised in our submission as issues that have the possibility of undermining the constitutional rights of patients.”
Open Letter from NEASA to the President: WHO International Pandemic Prevention Treaty
20 April 2022 • mailchi.mp Open Letter from NEASA to the President: WHO International Pandemic Prevention Treaty “From the clear and abundant failures of the WHO during the current pandemic, South Africans cannot condone your further knee-bending to this power-hungry, financial monopoly serving organisation.”
Canadian Police for Freedom Demand Criminal Investigations for Covid Crimes
19 April 2022 • drtrozzi.org Canadian Police for Freedom Demand Criminal Investigations for Covid Crimes Police for Freedom Canada has directed a detailed 88 page letter to Manitoba Police Forces demanding and justifying (in detail) a criminal investigation into Public Health officials in Manitoba for alleged COVID-19 crimes.
See All
The Red List Menu
Home Q&A The Red List Green List